ungroup_visuals

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It discloses the exact mechanics: clears parentGroupName from every child and removes the group container. Missing details like error behavior or prerequisites, but the core operation is well specified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and every word contributes. No fluff or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the main action but leaves gaps: the role of the 'page' parameter is unmentioned, and there is no note about prerequisites (e.g., group must exist) or failure behavior. Since the tool has three required params and no output schema, more context is needed for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds no parameter information beyond the input schema. The schema already states groupName comes from group_visuals; the description only restates that. It does not explain the role of page or reportSessionId, so it does not compensate for the 67% schema coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action (ungroup) and the resource (visual group), with specific behavioral detail: 'clears parentGroupName from every child and removes the group container.' It also implicitly distinguishes from siblings like group_visuals by referencing group_visuals as the source of groupName.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use the tool: when you have a group name from group_visuals and want to undo the grouping. It names the inverse tool (group_visuals), providing clear context, though it does not explicitly state exclusions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.