woo_get_order_notes
Retrieve all notes associated with a specific WooCommerce order by providing the order ID.
Instructions
Get order notes
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Order ID |
Retrieve all notes associated with a specific WooCommerce order by providing the order ID.
Get order notes
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Order ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication requirements, or what data is returned. For a tool with no output schema, the description should provide more transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (3 words) but at the expense of necessary details. It omits context, usage, and behavioral information. It is under-specified rather than efficiently concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of output schema and annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the order notes concept, how to use the id parameter, or what the tool returns. Completeness is lacking.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with one parameter 'id' described as 'Order ID'. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Get order notes', which specifies the verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish this tool from siblings like 'woo_get_order' or 'woo_add_order_note'. The purpose is clear but lacks differentiation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of context such as requiring an order ID or that it retrieves notes for a specific order. The agent receives no decision-making help.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cvrt-jh/wordpress-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server