mcp_update_menu_item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral traits. It only says 'Update' without disclosing side effects (e.g., reordering on position change), validation rules, partial update behavior, or error responses. Insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point, but lacks necessary behavioral and usage details. It is not optimally concise because it omits important context that would help an agent use the tool correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, error handling, or effects of updating parent/position. Leaves significant gaps for a non-trivial mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter described. The description adds minimal value by listing parameter names in parentheses, but schema already covers meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate as no extra semantic depth is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and resource 'menu item', listing the updatable fields in parentheses. It distinguishes from sibling tools like mcp_add_menu_item (create) and mcp_delete_menu_item (delete) and mcp_update_menu (update menu container).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as mcp_add_menu_item or mcp_update_menu. Missing prerequisites (e.g., valid item_id) or context (e.g., parent must exist). The description only states the action without usage conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.