clickup_delete_list
Permanently remove a ClickUp list by its ID. This action is irreversible.
Instructions
Delete a list. This is permanent and cannot be undone.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | ClickUp list ID |
Permanently remove a ClickUp list by its ID. This action is irreversible.
Delete a list. This is permanent and cannot be undone.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes | ClickUp list ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that deletion is permanent and irreversible, which is key behavioral info. However, it omits side effects such as whether tasks within the list are also deleted, and does not mention any required permissions or preconditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise at two sentences, front-loading the action and key warning. Every word adds value, with no redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one required parameter, no output schema, no nested objects) and the presence of a clear purpose description, the description is largely complete. It could be enhanced by noting effects on dependent resources, but overall it covers essential context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with only one parameter ('list_id') described as 'ClickUp list ID'. The description adds no further semantic detail about the parameter, so with high coverage, baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states 'Delete a list' which clearly identifies the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like clickup_delete_task or clickup_delete_checklist by focusing on list deletion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like clickup_create_list or clickup_delete_task. The permanence warning implies a cautionary use case, but no direct comparisons or context are given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cvrt-jh/clickup-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server