delete_rsi_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses the core action (canceling and deleting) but lacks details about side effects, permissions, irreversibility, or impact on related data. Without annotations, more behavioral context is expected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks structure such as bullet points or separation of purpose and usage. It is minimal but not well-organized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a deletion action with no output schema and no annotations, the description should provide more context about consequences or prerequisites. It falls short of being complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'uuid', and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema's own description. Baseline score applies as schema is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it cancels and deletes an RSI market order, but the tool name refers to an 'rsi_alert', creating potential confusion between an alert and a market order. The verb and resource are partially clear but could mislead.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like delete_rate_alert or update_rsi_alert. The description does not include any usage context or constraints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.