create_rate_alert

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. Clearly mentions notification on rate reached and auto-booking if book=true. Could be improved by noting if alerts are recurring or one-time, but overall sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states the purpose, second adds the key auto-booking behavior. No redundant information, every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Description covers core purpose and key behavior, but lacks information about what the tool returns (e.g., alert ID or confirmation). No output schema exists, so description should compensate for missing return value details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 91%, high. Description adds value beyond schema by explaining notification behavior ('When the market rate reaches target_rate, you are notified') and auto-booking trigger, which are not fully captured in parameter descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Creates a rate alert' with specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from sibling tools like list_rate_alerts, delete_rate_alert, and create_rsi_alert by focusing on creation and auto-booking behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: set up a rate alert for a target rate. No explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives like create_trade or create_rsi_alert, nor when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.