get_user_profile
Retrieve detailed profile information for any Discogs user by providing their username.
Instructions
Retrieve a user by username
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes |
Retrieve detailed profile information for any Discogs user by providing their username.
Retrieve a user by username
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Retrieve a user by username' without mentioning read-only nature, error conditions, or response behavior, leaving significant gaps.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence with no fluff. Every word adds value, making it highly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and numerous sibling tools, the description lacks completeness. It does not specify what the response contains, that calling it is safe, or how it differs from similar user retrieval tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description should add meaning beyond the parameter name. It merely restates 'by username' without providing details on format, case sensitivity, or constraints beyond the schema's minLength.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve') and resource ('user') along with the identifier ('by username'), making the tool's purpose unambiguous and distinguishable from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_user_identity or get_user_inventory. The description does not mention when not to use it or provide context for its appropriate invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cswkim/discogs-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server