delete_release_from_user_collection_folder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It does not explain what happens upon deletion (e.g., idempotency, side effects, permission requirements) or what the instance_id parameter represents. Minimal transparency beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two short, direct sentences—no wasted words. It front-loads the purpose and adds a single constraint. Ideal length for quick comprehension.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having 4 required parameters and no output schema, the description ignores crucial context: what instance_id signifies, error scenarios, required permissions, or how it differs from deleting a folder. Incomplete for a complex mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, so the description must compensate. It only redundantly states that folder_id must be non-zero (already enforced by schema) and provides no explanation of instance_id or release_id. Little added value over the schema's type constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'remove' and specifies the resource as 'an instance of a release from a user's collection folder'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like add_release_to_user_collection_folder and move_release_in_user_collection, which perform different operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_user_collection_folder, move_release_in_user_collection). It only mentions a constraint on folder_id but no context for proper usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.