get_list
Retrieve a Discogs list by its ID to view or manage its contents.
Instructions
Get a list by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes |
Retrieve a Discogs list by its ID to view or manage its contents.
Get a list by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| list_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like read-only, authentication requirements, or response structure. The description is insufficient for an unannotated tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary details. It does not waste words, but it also does not fully inform.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and only one parameter, the description should include more context about what a 'list' is and the return format. It is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the parameter name 'list_id'. It does not explain the parameter's format, constraints, or purpose.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'a list by ID', indicating it retrieves a specific list. However, it lacks differentiation from siblings like get_artist or get_release, which also fetch by ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_user_lists or get_user_wantlist. The description does not provide context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cswkim/discogs-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server