tools_subzy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as network activity, output format, or side effects. The description 'Execute subzy' is completely uninformative about what happens when the tool runs, which is especially concerning for a security scanning tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. It lacks essential information and reads as a placeholder, not a carefully crafted description that earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 parameters and no output schema, the description must compensate by explaining the tool's role and usage. This description provides almost no context, making it impossible for an agent to understand what the tool does, why to use it, or what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of the 'target' or 'additional_args' parameters. The description does not add any meaning beyond the raw schema properties, leaving the agent with no indication of what values to provide or how they are used.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Execute subzy' names a specific tool but does not explain what subzy does or how it differs from sibling tools like tools_subfinder or tools_httpx. It is a generic verb+resource statement without scope, making it difficult for an agent to know when to select this tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description lacks any context, exclusions, or mention of other tools. It simply says 'Execute subzy' with no indication of prerequisites or situations where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.