msf_session_destroy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action 'Destroy' but does not mention consequences like irreversibility, impact on active sessions, required privileges, or whether confirmation is needed. This is insufficient for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single terse sentence with no fluff, which is concise. However, it is under-specified to the point of being minimally informative, lacking any structure or additional context. It is not misleading but does not earn its place beyond stating the obvious.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, side effects, prerequisites (e.g., active session), or how session_id relates to existing sessions. The 1-parameter schema and simple action suggest low complexity, but the missing behavioral context is a significant gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema shows a required 'session_id' parameter but provides no description for it. The tool description does not mention this parameter or explain how to obtain the session ID, leaving the agent without guidance. Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Destroy MSF session' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly indicating the tool's action. However, it does not explicitly distinguish between destroying a single session versus all sessions, though the sibling msf_session_destroy_all exists and the parameter 'session_id' implies a single session.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool compared to alternatives such as msf_session_destroy_all or msf_session_list. The description gives no context for prerequisites, typical use cases, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.