Skip to main content
Glama
cryptopepy

chungus-kali-mcp

by cryptopepy
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to chungus-kali-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • redteam-mcp

      samirjani03
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A penetration testing MCP server that runs 20 hacking tools inside a Kali Linux Docker container, enabling AI assistants to execute security scans and attacks via natural language.
      2
      -

    • Kali MCP Server

      magichrist
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Production-grade MCP server that exposes Kali Linux penetration testing tools to AI agents, enabling automated reconnaissance, web application testing, vulnerability assessment, and more.
      -

    • pentestMCP

      RamKansal
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes over 20 standard penetration testing utilities, such as Nmap, SQLMap, and OWASP ZAP, as callable tools for AI agents. It enables natural language control over complex security workflows for automated and interactive penetration testing.
      97
      -

    • Kali-Mcp-Toolkit

      trymonoly
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes over 500 Kali Linux security tools to AI models for automated penetration testing and security auditing. It includes modules for tool execution, interactive terminal management, and sandboxed code editing across 12 security categories.
      16
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.1/5.0

    Scored across 155 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with domain-specific prefixes (tools_, forensics_, ad_, etc.) that clarify intent. However, some overlap exists, such as kali_exec vs exec_stream both executing arbitrary commands, and tools_ffuf vs api_ffuf_fuzz having very similar functionality with only context differentiating them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is dominated by domain prefixes (e.g., reverse_shell_, pivot_, ctf_), but the verb/noun order varies considerably across the set. Some tools use noun_verb (hosts_list, exploit_search), others use verb_noun (cve_search, send_input), and some are bare tool names (tools_nmap, ad_responder). This mixing is readable but not fully consistent.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 155 tools, the server is extremely over-scoped. The number far exceeds the typical 3-15 range and even the '50+' threshold for an extreme mismatch. This overwhelming count makes it difficult for an agent to efficiently select the right tool, severely reducing coherence.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a broad penetration testing lifecycle: recon (nmap, subfinder), exploitation (searchsploit, msf), post-exploitation (reverse shells, SSH, pivoting), AD attacks, web/API testing, forensics, and CTF helpers. The coverage is quite thorough, with only minor gaps such as a generic session manager to enumerate all active interactive sessions.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources