music_next_track
Skips to the next track in the Music app, letting your AI advance playback without manual control.
Instructions
Skips to the next track in the Music app.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Skips to the next track in the Music app, letting your AI advance playback without manual control.
Skips to the next track in the Music app.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v3.0.426Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does not disclose whether the Music app must already be open, whether skipping starts playback, what happens at the end of a queue, or what the tool returns.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It immediately communicates the action and target app.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter playback control, the description is minimally adequate. However, without annotations or an output schema, it should ideally mention playback prerequisites or edge-case behavior to fully orient an agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The input schema is empty and there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific verb ("Skips") and resource/action target ("next track in the Music app"). It implicitly distinguishes itself from music_previous_track, but does not explicitly name siblings or fully route the agent among the Music controls.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
It only states the action and gives no guidance on when to use it versus alternatives such as music_play, music_previous_track, or music_pause. There are no exclusions, prerequisites, or context conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.