snn_step

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It merely states 'Advance' without explaining side effects, state changes, blocking behavior, or whether the simulation runs asynchronously. This is insufficient for an AI agent to anticipate consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (4 words), but it sacrifices necessary detail. While there is no wasted text, the brevity undermines utility. An ideal description would include at least a brief note about the parameter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description should still clarify what 'advance' entails, e.g., 'Run the simulation forward by a specified number of timesteps.' The current text is too vague to determine if this is the intended meaning.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description does not mention the 'steps' parameter or explain its role. The agent must infer from the name and schema alone, which is insufficient for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Advance SNN Simulation' clearly states the action (advance) and the resource (SNN Simulation), indicating the tool progresses the simulation. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like snn_reset or simulation_control, which also deal with simulation state.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as snn_reset or simulation_control. There is no context on prerequisites, typical scenarios, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.