export_snapshot
Export the complete state snapshot of the neuromorphic simulation pipeline for analysis or backup.
Instructions
Full State Snapshot
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Export the complete state snapshot of the neuromorphic simulation pipeline for analysis or backup.
Full State Snapshot
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as destructiveness, read-only nature, required permissions, or side effects. The description 'Full State Snapshot' gives no behavioral insight.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short ('Full State Snapshot'), which might be seen as concise, but it is under-specified and fails to provide necessary information. Every word should earn its place; here they do not provide clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and the presence of 47 sibling tools, the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain what the snapshot contains, how it differs from other state tools, or how to interpret the output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and the input schema is empty. The baseline for 0 parameters is 4, as there are no parameters to describe. However, the description adds minimal semantic value beyond the schema, but it does not contradict or mislead.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Full State Snapshot' is a tautology of the tool name 'export_snapshot' and fails to specify what state is being exported or what 'snapshot' entails. It provides no verb or resource differentiation, making it unclear what the tool does.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like get_snn_state or get_system_status. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/christophejlegros-lgtm/ASTRA-Unified-ResearchLab-MCP-v2.7'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server