sensor_process

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states a high-level purpose without mentioning side effects, permissions, rate limits, or what happens during processing (e.g., reading vs simulating). Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, a single sentence with no filler. However, it may be too brief to provide sufficient context; a bit more detail could be added without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a multimodal pipeline with three optional parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the output format, defaults, or how to use parameters effectively. Much more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions fully cover the three parameters (visualSource, audioFrequency, compounds) with clear explanations. The description adds the context that all modalities are fused, but does not elaborate on how parameters affect the output. Given 100% schema coverage, baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Full Multimodal Pipeline (All Modalities → Fused z)' clearly indicates the tool processes all sensor modalities and fuses them, distinguishing it from individual sensor tools like sensor_audio, sensor_visual, and sensor_olfactory. However, it lacks a specific verb and elaboration on what 'fused z' means.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidelines are provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives like sensor_fuse or individual sensor tools. The description offers no context for appropriate usage or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.