snowflake_describe_streamlit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Describe' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state that it has no side effects, makes no modifications, or requires specific permissions. It adds no insight beyond what the tool name already conveys.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no filler. It front-loads the core purpose and is appropriately sized for a simple describe operation. Every word adds value and there is no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has three parameters with zero schema coverage and no annotations, the description fails to provide essential context. It does not explain parameter semantics, usage prerequisites, or behavioral guarantees. While an output schema exists, the input parameters remain completely undocumented, leaving an agent without enough information to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the JSON schema provides no descriptions for the parameters. The description does not explain any of the parameters (database, schema_name, streamlit_name) or how they relate to the output. It only mentions output attributes, providing zero value for parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Describe' and the resource 'Streamlit application', and specifies the exact attributes it returns: root location, stage, and query warehouse. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like snowflake_list_streamlits (listing vs describing) and other describe tools for different resources (e.g., snowflake_describe_stage).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: if you need details about a Streamlit application, use this tool. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this versus alternatives (e.g., snowflake_list_streamlits for listing) or any exclusions. The context is clear but not explicitly framed as a routing instruction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.