Skip to main content
Glama

Snowflake Create Task

snowflake_create_task

Create scheduled or serverless tasks in Snowflake by defining a task name and SQL statement, with optional database, schema, warehouse, and schedule settings.

Instructions

Create a scheduled or serverless task in Snowflake.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
databaseNo
scheduleNo
task_nameYes
warehouseNo
schema_nameNo
if_not_existsNo
sql_statementYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed10 schema fields changedv1.2.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • removedInput schema / properties / database / title
      Removed value: -"Database"
    • removedInput schema / properties / if_not_exists / title
      Removed value: -"If Not Exists"
    • removedInput schema / properties / schedule / title
      Removed value: -"Schedule"
    • removedInput schema / properties / schema_name / title
      Removed value: -"Schema Name"
    • removedInput schema / properties / sql_statement / title
      Removed value: -"Sql Statement"
    • removedInput schema / properties / task_name / title
      Removed value: -"Task Name"
    • removedInput schema / properties / warehouse / title
      Removed value: -"Warehouse"
    • removedInput schema / title
      Removed value: -"snowflake_create_taskArguments"
    • removedOutput schema / title
      Removed value: -"snowflake_create_taskDictOutput"
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only the 'scheduled or serverless' nuance and says nothing about required privileges, what if_not_exists=true does when the task exists, or side effects of creating a scheduled task.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is appropriately short, though it borders on under-specification rather than true conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be described, and annotations cover the safety profile. But with 7 undocumented parameters at 0% coverage, a mutation tool, and a complex scheduling domain, the description is far too thin to let an agent invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 7 parameters, so the schema supplies names only. The description mentions scheduling and serverless concepts but never maps them to the schedule, warehouse, database/schema_name, or if_not_exists parameters, leaving the burden unmet.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb+resource ('Create ... task') and the 'scheduled or serverless' qualifier narrows the kind of task. It does not, however, explicitly distinguish this from siblings like snowflake_create_alert or snowflake_execute_task, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no routing to alternatives such as snowflake_execute_task or snowflake_create_alert. The agent is left to infer the usage context entirely.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools