snowflake_create_stage

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Create', implying a mutation, but does not mention required permissions, side effects, idempotency (despite the if_not_exists parameter), or any other operational details. The minimal wording leaves significant behavioral uncertainty.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. However, it is so terse that it borders on under-specification, though for the purpose of clarity it is concise and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters (1 required), no annotations, 0% parameter coverage, and no usage context, the description is grossly incomplete. It does not explain what a stage is used for, when to call this tool, or what the output signifies. An agent cannot confidently decide to invoke this tool based on the description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any parameters. The schema lists stage_name, comment, database, schema_name, and if_not_exists, but their roles and relationships are not described. The description offers no clue about what values are expected or how they affect the operation, so the agent is left guessing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action (create) and the resource (an internal named stage in Snowflake). It is specific enough to distinguish from other create tools like snowflake_create_database or snowflake_create_schema, though it does not explicitly reference them. The purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of scenarios where creating a stage is appropriate, nor any reference to related tools like list_stages or describe_stage. The description simply states the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.