A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceAn MCP server that integrates Harvest time tracking and Forecast resource scheduling APIs, enabling AI agents to track time, manage projects, and handle assignments and scheduling.
34
MIT
mcp-server-smartsheet-rm
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-smartsheet-rm
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to interact with OpenProject API v3 for project management, including creating and managing work packages, projects, comments, time entries, boards, and user dashboards.41 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Clockify time tracking via curated workflows and a generic API tool for managing workspaces, projects, tasks, and time entries.922 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to interact with Moxie CRM. Provides comprehensive tools for managing clients, contacts, projects, invoices, time tracking, and more.307 npm3MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Plane integration, enabling AI agents to interact with Plane APIs and services for project management tasks.100MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceThis MCP server allows AI assistants to interact with the Beebole REST API for time tracking management.4MIT
TDQS
C2.6/5.0
Scored across 98 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Tools are largely distinct by resource and action, but overlaps exist (e.g., time_create_approval and time_update_time_approval_status both manage time entry approvals; timesheet tools like fill/confirm/reconcile could be confused). With 98 tools, minor ambiguity is inevitable, but descriptions generally help.
Naming Consistency4/5
Consistent snake_case with a clear prefix_action pattern (time_, projects_, admin_). Minor deviations like 'set' vs 'update' and plural/singular inconsistencies (user_statuses vs user_status) slightly reduce predictability.
Tool Count1/5
98 tools is extreme over-provisioning for any single server. Even for a complex RM domain, this count is a usability hazard, far exceeding the 15-tool guideline.
Completeness4/5
Broad coverage of projects, time, and admin entities, including CRUD for most resources and special operations. Minor gaps like missing update for tags, expense categories, and client contacts, but overall surface is comprehensive.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues