sigma_list_workbook_page_elements

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds page scoping, but no additional behavioral details such as pagination, ordering, or what counts as an 'element'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It states exactly what the tool does in the most efficient way possible.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With only two self-explanatory parameters, an output schema, and read-safe annotations, the description is largely sufficient. A small gap remains in not referencing related tools or response shape, but overall it is complete for a simple list operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, leaving the description to bear the burden. It mentions 'specific page', which clarifies page_id, but does not explain workbook_id or the expected format/value semantics beyond the parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List elements on a specific page of a workbook' uses a specific verb ('List'), names the resource ('elements'), and includes a clear scope ('specific page'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like sigma_list_workbook_elements and sigma_list_workbook_pages.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as sigma_list_workbook_elements, sigma_list_workbook_pages, or sigma_get_element_query. The context is implied by the name but not explicitly explained.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.