sigma_create_tenant

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only restates the obvious 'create' action, which is already implied by the tool name. It fails to disclose any behavioral details such as idempotency, unique constraints, or permission requirements, and annotations are minimal (readOnlyHint false).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no redundant information, earning a high score for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation tool with two parameters and no behavioral details, the description is too sparse. It does not explain the optional 'body' parameter or any constraints, making it insufficient for reliable tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has two parameters (name, body) with 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the 'body' parameter or clarify that 'name' is required, leaving parameters semantically under-specified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Create' with the resource 'tenant organization', clearly identifying the tool's function. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sigma_create_team and sigma_create_workspace by the resource type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. It only states the basic action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.