sigma_delete_user_attribute_for_user

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description reinforces this with 'DESTRUCTIVE.' It adds the operational requirement that confirm=True must be passed, which is critical because the schema defaults confirm to false. This extra context is valuable beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences that immediately state the action, the target, and the mandatory confirmation flag. No wasted words, and the most critical safety information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple deletion operation with a clear resource and a confirm flag. The description covers the destructive nature and the required confirmation. Since there is an output schema, the description does not need to elaborate on return values. Minor lack of explicit alternatives and parameter details keeps it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning for the parameters. It only clarifies 'confirm' by saying 'Requires confirm=True.' The attribute_id and user_id parameters are left to their self-explanatory names, with no additional context about their role or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Delete') and a clear resource ('user attribute assignment for a specific user'). It directly distinguishes itself from sibling tools like sigma_delete_user_attribute_for_team and sigma_delete_user_attribute_for_tenant by specifying 'for a specific user'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool: to remove a user attribute assignment for a particular user. It also provides an important usage requirement ('Requires confirm=True'), but it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives such as sigma_update_user_attribute_for_users or sigma_set_user_attribute_for_teams.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.