delete_budget

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It says 'Delete (deactivate)' suggesting mutation but does not disclose whether the deletion is reversible, what side effects occur (e.g., breaking alerts or cost tracking), or required permissions. This is a significant gap for a destructive action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: a one-line purpose, an Args section, and examples. No filler. Front-loaded with the action verb. Every sentence serves a clear purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose, parameter source, and usage examples. It lacks a note on return value (e.g., success/error) but is otherwise adequate. Missing behavioral transparency slightly reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter, budget_id, has no schema description. The description adds value by explaining it comes from list_budgets and showing examples that map to a numeric ID. This helps the agent understand how to obtain the correct value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Delete (deactivate)' and the resource 'budget by ID'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like set_budget (create/update) and list_budgets (list). The mention of 'budget_id from list_budgets' further clarifies the context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes an 'Args' section specifying that budget_id comes from list_budgets, and provides concrete examples. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_budget for modification) or mention prerequisites like budget existence.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.