CAD-CAE-Agent SolidWorks MCP Server

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

add_sketch_constraint

Adds geometric constraints like parallel, perpendicular, tangent, or coincident between sketch entities to create fully defined parametric sketches that maintain design intent.

Instructions

Add a geometric constraint/relation between sketch entities.

Creates geometric relationships between sketch entities such as parallel, perpendicular, tangent, coincident, etc. Essential for creating fully defined, parametric sketches that maintain design intent.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`input_data`	Yes	The input data value.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedv1.2.0Sep 29, 2026

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the function without noting potential failures, prerequisites (e.g., active sketch), or whether it modifies existing constraints. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no redundancy. The first sentence immediately states the core purpose, followed by examples and context. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not explain return values (though output schema exists), prerequisites (e.g., active sketch), or error conditions. For a geometric constraint tool in a CAD context, more context is expected for safe usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, already documenting all parameters. The description adds no new semantic details beyond listing relation types, which the schema already includes. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool adds geometric constraints/relations between sketch entities, with specific examples (parallel, perpendicular, etc.). It distinguishes from sibling tools like add_sketch_dimension and sketch creation tools by focusing on constraints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions it is essential for fully defined parametric sketches, which implies when to use. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternatives, such as add_sketch_dimension for dimensions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server