Skip to main content
Glama
caoguanqiu1-alt

CAD-CAE-Agent SolidWorks MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to CAD-CAE-Agent SolidWorks MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude or any MCP client to drive a live SOLIDWORKS session through its COM API, modeling parts, building assemblies with mates, checking interferences and machining feasibility, and exporting STEP or DXF files. It also exposes a local semantic index of the SOLIDWORKS API so the model can look up signatures, enums, and official examples before running arbitrary Python against the session.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to build, measure, verify, and correct parametric SolidWorks parts and assemblies locally via the COM API, supporting operations like sketching, extruding, modeling, dimensioning, material assignment, export, and assembly mating.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables control of a live SOLIDWORKS session through the Windows COM API, providing native sketch, feature, body, reference-geometry, view, probe, and export operations, along with transactional CAD plans, parametric sketches, multibody tools, and deterministic raster-to-sketch vectorization pipelines.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to automate SolidWorks (open/save parts, modify dimensions, export STEP) via COM, and optionally generate geometry using build123d code-CAD with PNG previews.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a running SOLIDWORKS session through its COM API, with tools for sketching, feature creation, assemblies, and visual feedback via screenshots.
      13
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 133 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools overlap heavily, such as open_model/load_part/load_assembly, save_file/save_as/save_part/save_assembly, and multiple drawing analysis/compliance tools. Macro recording and VBA generation have near-duplicate pairs (e.g., start_macro_recording vs automation_start_macro_recording), causing unclear boundaries for selection.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Tool names are mostly snake_case, but verb choice is inconsistent across similar operations: load_part vs open_model, save_part vs save_file, get_mass_properties vs calculate_mass_properties, and generate_vba_extrusion vs create_extrusion. The duplicated concepts with different naming conventions make the set harder to predict.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 133 tools, the server is massively over-scoped for a single MCP surface, far beyond the 3–15 range typical of a coherent set. The count includes many aliases, wrappers, tutorial tools, and overlapping VBA generators, indicating an extreme mismatch.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface broadly covers part modeling, sketching, features, assemblies, drawings, export, macros, templates, analysis, and API documentation lookup. Some notable gaps remain, such as limited assembly mating (reference geometry only) and no sheet metal, weldments, simulation, or BOM-specific tools, but core CAD workflows are largely represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues