unblock_user
Remove a block to restore normal interactions with a user in the AT Protocol ecosystem.
Instructions
Unblock a previously blocked user to restore normal interactions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| actor | Yes |
Remove a block to restore normal interactions with a user in the AT Protocol ecosystem.
Unblock a previously blocked user to restore normal interactions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| actor | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Adds context that unblocking restores normal interactions, but minimal disclosure on side effects or prerequisites; no annotations to contradict.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words, efficiently conveys core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter and no output schema; description is minimal but misses details like expected value of actor, error conditions, or idempotency.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Description does not explain the 'actor' parameter beyond the schema; schema coverage is 0% and description fails to compensate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'unblock', the resource 'user', and the scope 'previously blocked', distinguishing it from sibling tools like block_user.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage as the counterpart to block_user, but no explicit guidance on when to use or exclude alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/cameronrye/atproto-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server