create_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action and list types, but does not mention side effects (e.g., whether creation is reversible), required permissions, rate limits, or any other behavior beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and object. It is concise, but the brevity comes at the cost of missing crucial details, making it less informative than it could be.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, prerequisites, or behavior nuances. Essential information for creation is missing, making the tool harder to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain all parameters. It only implicitly covers the 'purpose' enum values, leaving 'name' and 'description' unexplained. The constraints (minLength, maxLength) and optionality are not mentioned, failing to add meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Create' and resource 'list', and explicitly distinguishes two subtypes: 'curate list' for organizing users and 'mod list' for moderation. This clearly differentiates from sibling tools like 'add_to_list' or 'get_list' which perform different actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states when to use each list type ('for organizing users' or 'moderation purposes'), providing clear context. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use this tool or compare it to alternatives, such as 'add_to_list' for adding users to existing lists.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.