Skip to main content
Glama
cameronrye

AT Protocol MCP Server

by cameronrye
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AT Protocol MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-bluesky

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Bluesky social network through the AT Protocol, including searching posts, fetching profiles, browsing feeds, and retrieving threads and follower data.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • bluesky-mcp

      thenavidm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Bluesky through 41 tools covering posting, threads, replies, timelines, search, custom feeds, lists, notifications, and the social graph.
      41
      176 npm
      MIT

    • Bluesky MCP Server

      kud
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables search, reading, and posting to Bluesky from any MCP client; features 11 tools (5 read, 6 write) with gated writes requiring explicit confirmation to prevent accidental publishing.
      11
      11 npm
      MIT

    • Bluesky MCP Server

      ffylaktis
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects to Bluesky and provides natural language tools to interact with the ATProtocol, enabling feed fetching, post management, search, and profile analysis.
      32
      -

    • Bluesky MCP

      thenavidm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to post, reply, run threads, read timelines, search, manage follows, and analyze engagement on Bluesky, with setup requiring only a handle and app password.
      41
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 51 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting specific actions on specific resources (posts, users, lists, bookmarks, etc.). Overlap is minimal and explicitly addressed in tool descriptions, with cross-references to alternative tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_post, delete_post, follow_user, search_actors). The naming convention is uniform across all 51 tools, with no mixing of styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    51 tools is a high count, but it covers the extensive AT Protocol surface area (posts, threads, likes, reposts, follows, lists, moderation, search, DMs, bookmarks, media uploads). While slightly heavy, each tool serves a necessary function.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably comprehensive, covering virtually all core social media operations including CRUD for posts, follows, likes, reposts, lists, moderation, direct messages, bookmarks, and media. No significant gaps are apparent for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources