get_model_xml

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the behavioral burden. It indicates a read operation ('for preview') but does not explicitly state that it is non-destructive or mention any side effects, response format, or size constraints. Given the simplicity of a parameterless retrieval, the description is adequate but could be more explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise and to the point, with no wasted words. It could be slightly more informative, but it is appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and a straightforward retrieval, the description is mostly complete. However, it does not clarify what 'current model' refers to, whether the model must be created first, or how the preview differs from read_model's output. This leaves minor ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so the description need not add parameter information. Schema description coverage is 100%, meeting the baseline. The description adds no parameter detail but that is acceptable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the XMILE XML representation of the current model for preview. It uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'XMILE XML representation', effectively distinguishing from sibling tools like read_model, save_model, and mutating tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'for preview', implying usage for inspection rather than modification or saving. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like read_model or validate_model, nor does it mention exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.