Skip to main content
Glama
bradleylab

Stella MCP Server

by bradleylab
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Stella MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • IFCX MCP

      louistrue
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create, edit, and export IFC5/IFCX building information models through natural language, handling spatial structure, elements, geometry, metadata, validation, and export.
      73
      7 npm
      25
      Apache 2.0
    • idfkit-mcp by idfkit

      idfkit-mcpofficial

      idfkit
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to create, edit, and simulate EnergyPlus building energy models via natural language. Supports schema exploration, model editing, simulation execution, and documentation search.
      39
      3
      MIT

    • poietic-mcp

      soobrosa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to read, edit, validate, and simulate Poietic Stock and Flow designs by driving the poietic CLI, allowing collaborative work with humans in Poietic Playground.
      18
      1
      -

    • OpenKer Modeler MCP Server

      cslv1
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to traverse SysML v2 model graphs, query requirements, and perform impact analysis for model-based systems engineering. It allows agents to interact with plain-text models to automate documentation and refine system architectures.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 44 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few close pairs (create_model vs build_model, add_variables vs add_stock/add_flow/add_aux) could cause slight confusion. Descriptions help resolve these overlaps, so overall the set is mostly unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names consistently use lowercase snake_case with verb-first patterns (list_*, add_*, update_*, delete_*). A few longer names like sync_connectors_from_equations and auto_place_module_boxes deviate from the simple verb_noun form but remain predictable and readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 44 tools, the server is significantly over-scoped for the domain. Many tools could be consolidated (e.g., update_stock/update_flow/update_aux into update_variable, add_stock/add_flow/add_aux into add_variable), and the count exceeds the recommended range even for a complex system dynamics editor.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the full modeling lifecycle: workspace management, model creation/loading/saving, variable CRUD, connector manipulation, module organization, diagram rendering, templates, simulation, and analysis. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit delete_connector or get_single_variable), but these are workable via existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources