Skip to main content
Glama

delete_variable

Destructive

Delete a variable from a Stella system dynamics model, cleaning connectors and module membership. Force option enables detaching connected flows.

Instructions

Delete a stock/flow/aux and clean connectors/module membership

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
model_idNoSession-scoped model ID. Optional; defaults to the current model for this session.
nameYesVariable name to delete
forceNoAllow deleting stocks that still have connected flows (flows are detached)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, so destructiveness is clear. The description adds behavioral context about cleaning connectors and module membership, which is beyond annotations. However, it doesn't mention the force parameter's effect (detaching flows), which is covered in schema but not in description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with verb and resource, no wasted words. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with destructive annotations, the description is mostly complete. It tells the main action and cleanup. Could mention irreversibility or the force behavior, but schema covers the latter. Overall adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and all parameters have descriptions. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'stock/flow/aux', and adds 'clean connectors/module membership' which distinguishes it from other delete operations like delete_model or delete_module.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_model, delete_module). The usage is implied but not clarified, leaving the agent without decision support.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bradleylab/stella-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server