close_document
Close a document. Refuses if there are unsaved changes, unless forced.
Instructions
Close a document. Refuses if there are unsaved changes unless force=True.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| force | No | ||
| doc_id | Yes |
Close a document. Refuses if there are unsaved changes, unless forced.
Close a document. Refuses if there are unsaved changes unless force=True.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| force | No | ||
| doc_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses key behavior (refuses if unsaved unless force=True) but with no annotations, more detail on side effects or requirements would strengthen transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two clear sentences with no extraneous information. Essential behavior and parameter condition are front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple tool given sibling context; covers main behavior and key parameter, but could elaborate on post-close state and doc_id scope.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Adds meaning for 'force' parameter but does not describe 'doc_id'. Schema has 0% description coverage, so description partially compensates.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the action 'Close' and resource 'document'. Distinguishes well from sibling tools like open_document and save_document.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly gives context by stating the refusal behavior with unsaved changes, but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives like save first.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/blwfish/LibreOffice-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server