list_smart_contract_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It implies a read-only listing operation but does not explicitly state that it is safe, non-destructive, or whether it requires network access or has rate limits. The description focuses on content rather than behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two straightforward sentences. It front-loads the key information ('Audited Solidity templates') and provides concrete examples, earning its place without extraneous detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters and no output schema, the description adequately informs the agent what the tool returns (a list of template types from known sources). It could mention that each template has an identifier or that tools like 'get_smart_contract_template' can retrieve details, but it is largely complete for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the schema coverage is 100% trivially. The description adds value by listing the categories of templates available, which informs the agent about the expected output schema beyond the empty input schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists audited Solidity templates and enumerates specific types (ERC20, ERC721, etc.) and sources (OpenZeppelin, BCA academy). This distinguishes it from sibling tool 'get_smart_contract_template' which retrieves a single template. The verb 'list' is explicit in the name, and the description confirms the scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, when not to use it, or suggest related tools like 'get_smart_contract_template' for a specific template.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.