list_marketing_templates

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, yet the description does not disclose behavior such as read-only nature, return format (just names or full details), pagination, or authentication requirements. Minimal transparency for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with key examples and tier info; no fluff. Information is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and many sibling tools, the description lacks details on return structure, what 'Starter tier' entails, and whether other tiers exist. Does not fully equip an agent for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema, so description doesn't need to explain them. The listing of template types adds some semantic value beyond the tool name, justifying a baseline of 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists campaign templates with specific examples (TGE checklist, airdrop ops, etc.) and mentions 'Starter tier', which distinguishes it from `get_marketing_template` that likely fetches a single template.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like `get_marketing_template`. The 'Starter tier' hint is vague and doesn't clarify when to choose list vs get.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.