Skip to main content
Glama
blackwaxxx

buildium-mcp

by blackwaxxx

Buildium Health

buildium_health
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check the Buildium server's environment, write mode, and indexed operation count; if unconfigured, it shows exactly what to set.

Instructions

Report which Buildium environment this server is bound to (sandbox, production read-only, production read-only with file downloads, or production with writes), the active write mode, how many operations are indexed, and — if the server is not configured — exactly what to set.

Only needed before a WRITE, when the environment is genuinely in doubt, or when another tool reports a startup problem. Read-only questions do not require it.

Deliberately not wrapped by _guarded: this is the one tool that must answer when everything else cannot, so it reports status rather than raising.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds material behavioral context beyond the annotations: it is deliberately not wrapped by _guarded, is the one tool that must answer when everything else cannot, and reports status rather than raising. This is valuable information an agent would not infer from readOnlyHint or idempotentHint alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences with no wasted words: the first states what it reports, the second states when it is needed, and the third explains its deliberate exception behavior. The most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, usage conditions, output scope, and resilience behavior, and an output schema exists to document return values. Nothing an agent needs to decide whether to call this tool is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters and an empty input schema, there is no parameter burden for the description to carry. The description focuses on what the tool reports rather than input semantics, matching the baseline for parameterless tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Report') and enumerates the exact resource and outputs: Buildium environment, write mode, indexed operation count, and configuration guidance. This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling list/call/upload/download tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says when to use the tool ('before a WRITE', 'environment is genuinely in doubt', 'another tool reports a startup problem') and when not to use it ('Read-only questions do not require it'). This provides clear selection guidance without needing to name a specific alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.