list_own_days_off
Retrieve your days off for any given year. Specify the year to get a list of your scheduled days off.
Instructions
Get your own days off for a specific year
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| year | Yes | Year (e.g., 2025) |
Retrieve your days off for any given year. Specify the year to get a list of your scheduled days off.
Get your own days off for a specific year
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| year | Yes | Year (e.g., 2025) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states it's a 'Get' operation, omitting details like authentication needs, error handling, or output format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every word is necessary and earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal but adequate for a simple list tool. However, it lacks information about return format, error cases, or whether results are filtered by the current user.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (%year is described as 'Year (e.g., 2025)'). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'your own days off', and the scope 'for a specific year'. It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'list_coworkers_days_off' by specifying 'own'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving one's own days off for a given year, distinguishing it from the sibling tool for coworkers. However, it does not provide explicit when-not-to-use guidance or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/bitterpanda63/officient-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server