Skip to main content
Glama
bill-kopp-ai-dev

Percival Ubuntu

by bill-kopp-ai-dev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Percival Ubuntu

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Lilith Shell

      charles-adedotun
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An enhanced MCP server that grants AI assistants the ability to execute terminal commands on a user's system with improved security controls, designed for use in controlled environments.
      2
      MIT

    • AX Local Operations MCP Server

      AndersHsueh
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that enables AI models to perform local file operations, command execution, and task management across multiple platforms. It features advanced capabilities like row-level file editing, directory searching, and system monitoring with built-in security filters.
      13
      22 npm
      Mulan Permissive Software , Version 2

    • Ubuntu MCP Server

      pazuzu1w
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure protocol server that allows AI assistants to safely interact with Ubuntu systems through controlled file operations, command execution, package management, and system information retrieval.
      42
      MIT

    • pc-control-mcp

      gugu9999gu
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A safety-first MCP server enabling file inspection/editing, allowlisted command execution, process listing, and optional desktop automation. It emphasizes security with disabled writes/commands/GUI by default and local feature gates.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct operations: file listing/reading/writing, package search, system telemetry, and server health. However, install_package is misleadingly named for a read-only check and could be confused with search_packages, while get_system_info and get_server_status have some overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool follows the same ubuntu_<verb>_<noun> snake_case pattern: execute_command, list_directory, read_file, search_packages, write_file, get_system_info, install_package, get_server_status. The convention is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is a well-scoped size for an Ubuntu server management surface. Each tool addresses a distinct aspect of the domain without feeling redundant or overly narrow.

    Completeness3/5

    The file and package workflows are partially incomplete: there is no delete_file tool, and install_package does not actually install packages, leaving no dedicated install/remove operation. Core read/write/search operations are covered, but lifecycle coverage has notable gaps that may push agents toward execute_command.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources