Skip to main content
Glama

set_frame_range

Set the scene's global frame range by specifying start and end frames, which controls playback and simulation boundaries.

Instructions

Set the global frame range.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "start": "<start>",
      "end": "<end>"
    },
    "name": "set_frame_range"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
endYes
startYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.7/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden yet only says it sets a range. It does not disclose whether this is a mutation affecting playback, rendering or caches, whether it is undoable, what happens when start > end, or whether re-cooking occurs — all material for a two-parameter setter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short, front-loaded sentence with no wasted wording. It is efficient, though its brevity stems partly from under-specification rather than disciplined editing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an unannotated mutation tool with two undocumented required parameters, no output schema, and overlapping siblings, the description is too thin. It omits behavior, parameter meaning, and routing guidance an agent needs to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds nothing about start/end: no units (frames vs seconds), no inclusive/exclusive boundary semantics, no constraint that start <= end, and no indication whether non-integer values are meaningful. The two required parameters remain fully unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb+resource ('Set' + 'global frame range'), so an agent can tell it mutates a range rather than a single frame. It does not distinguish this from siblings like set_playback_range or cook_frame_range, leaving ambiguity about which 'range' concept is being set.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of alternatives such as set_playback_range or cook_frame_range, despite several siblings that plausibly overlap. The agent must infer the appropriate context entirely.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools