Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to paperless-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only and write MCP server for Paperless-ngx, enabling document listing, metadata retrieval, and creation of tags, correspondents, document types, and sorting workflows via natural language.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for Paperless-ngx that provides full REST API coverage for document management, including search, upload, metadata, workflows, sharing, and admin, with token-frugal responses and a scoped toolset.
      85
      55 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A privacy-first MCP server for Paperless-ngx that lets an LLM agent search, organize, tag, and reference documents without exposing full text unless explicitly requested.
      13
      -

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 44 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions clearly differentiate get_document (metadata) vs get_document_content vs get_document_thumbnail vs download_document. However, the document-listing trio (list_documents, query_documents, and the deprecated search_documents) overlaps, forcing the agent to reason about which to pick even though the descriptions do explain the boundary.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set follows a strong verb_noun convention (list_/get_/create_/update_/delete_/bulk_edit_ + resource) applied uniformly across tags, correspondents, document types, and custom fields. The only notable deviation is post_document (instead of create_document), a minor inconsistency in an otherwise predictable scheme.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 44 tools this is heavy, well above the typical 3-15 sweet spot, though the breadth is partly justified by six distinct resource domains (documents, tags, correspondents, document types, custom fields, mail). Repetition such as five near-identical bulk_edit_* tools and the deprecated search_documents adds weight without fully earning its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface is comprehensive: full CRUD plus bulk operations across all major entities, document content/thumbnail/download, notes, and mail accounts/rules. Minor gaps remain—storage paths are referenced as filters but have no management tools, and single-document deletion is only reachable through bulk_edit_documents' 'delete' method.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week