Skip to main content
Glama

gif_palette

Analyze the GIF global color table for steganographic indicators, reporting sort order, duplicate entries, unused slots, color distribution, and luminance profile.

Instructions

Analyze the GIF global color table for steganographic indicators. Reports sort order, duplicate entries, unused slots, color distribution, and luminance profile.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
file_pathYesPath to GIF image file
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description effectively discloses behavioral traits: it is a read-only analysis tool that reports specific metrics (sort order, duplicates, etc.). No side effects or contradictions are noted, and the description sufficiently informs the agent of expected behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, using two sentences to convey the core purpose and details. It is front-loaded with the key action and avoids unnecessary verbiage. Every sentence provides value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter tool, the description is nearly complete. It lists what the report covers (color distribution, luminance profile, etc.), which compensates for the lack of an output schema. Minor omission: it does not specify the output format (e.g., text report), but this is not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'file_path' is described in the schema as 'Path to GIF image file'. The description adds no further semantics beyond this, and schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the description does not enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: analyzing the GIF global color table for steganographic indicators. It specifies what it reports (sort order, duplicate entries, etc.) and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like gif_palette_lsb by focusing on global table analysis.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for steganographic analysis of GIF color tables but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No 'when-not' conditions or alternative tool names are mentioned, leaving the agent to infer context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/badchars/steganography-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server