get_doc_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It states the tool returns 'full content,' implying a read operation, but does not specify permissions, output format, or what constitutes 'full content' (e.g., formatting, comments, subpages). It adds some context but leaves significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with the verb 'Get' first. It is concise and contains no redundant phrasing or repetition of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple getter with three fully described parameters. No output schema exists, so the description should clarify what is returned. It states 'full content,' which gives a general sense but lacks detail about the content structure or how it differs from listing endpoints. Minor gap given the simplicity of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter described in the input schema. The description enhances understanding by noting the page belongs to a doc, but it does not add meaningful extra semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the specific resource ('a single page within a ClickUp Doc'), and the scope ('with its full content'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_doc_pages (which lists pages) and get_doc (which retrieves the document itself).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: when you need a single page's full content. However, it does not explicitly state alternatives or when not to use it, such as using get_doc_pages to list pages or get_doc_blocks for block-level access. Usage is implied but not explicitly contrasted with related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.