a207-clinical-calc-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to a207-clinical-calc-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD follow-up management, providing tools to schedule follow-ups based on KDIGO 2024 guidelines, retrieve follow-up records, compute adherence scores, and access PEW history.4-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server generates individualized meal plans for children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on KDIGO 2024/PRNT 2020/KRCP 2025 guidelines, incorporating patient age, CKD stage, allergies, dietary culture, and diet diary analysis. It provides deterministic nutrient computations and tools for meal plan generation, food database lookup, and risk analysis.13MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD nutrition and food calculations, enabling energy/protein targets, food nutrient lookup, substitutions, meal summaries, and drug-nutrient interaction checks.8-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server providing pediatric CKD patient master data with tools for patient profiles, diagnosis, nutrition ceilings, guardian verification, and patient lists, designed for the CKDNutri project.5-
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for pediatric CKD lab data, providing lab panel queries, critical value alerts, trend analysis, and write operations with role-based permissions.5-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMock MCP server for pediatric CKD risk warning, enabling patient biochemical trend retrieval, deterministic risk rule evaluation, structured alert triggering, and clinical SOP lookup using simulated data.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools are clearly distinct: one calculates eGFR, the other classifies CKD stage based on eGFR and albuminuria. There is no overlap in functionality or purpose.
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase snake_case ('calc_egfr_schwartz' and 'classify_ckd'). The naming convention is uniform and predictable.
With only two tools, the server is on the minimal side, but the tools form a cohesive workflow for pediatric kidney assessment. The count is borderline for the stated clinical calculator purpose.
The tools cover the entire workflow from eGFR calculation (with multiple Schwartz methods) to CKD staging, including necessary inputs like albuminuria. No obvious gaps exist within the narrow domain.