rollout_restart_deployment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It mentions a rolling restart but does not disclose potential side effects (e.g., pod recreation, auth requirements, synchronicity). The reference to 'oc rollout restart' provides indirect knowledge but lacks explicit behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely concise: one sentence plus a three-line argument list. Action is front-loaded, and every piece of information earns its place. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of an output schema, the description is fairly complete for the core purpose. However, it omits details about what happens after triggering the restart (e.g., rollout status, error scenarios), which could be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must compensate, but it only lists parameter names with defaults. No additional meaning or constraints are provided beyond what the schema titles imply. The defaults are helpful but insufficient for semantic clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (trigger a rolling restart) and the resource (Deployment), and provides an equivalent command ('oc rollout restart'). No sibling tool with similar purpose, making it easily distinguishable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description does not explicitly guide when to use vs. alternatives (e.g., delete_pod, restart_virtual_machine). It only states the equivalent command, leaving usage context implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.