List Konflux releases for a given namespace, showing snapshot, status, and target workspace. Filter by application or cluster to quickly identify release states and troubleshoot delivery issues.
List Konflux Releases with snapshot, status, and target workspace.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cluster | No | ||
| namespace | Yes | ||
| application_name | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry behavioral info. It indicates a non-mutating list operation by the verb 'List' but provides no explicit read-only statement, no details on scope, permissions, or side effects. This is minimal but not misleading.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence that is front-loaded with the action and includes the essential output fields. No unnecessary words or repetition.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a list operation, the absence of output schema detail is mitigated by the existence of an output schema, but the definition does not explain parameter usage, the meaning of 'target workspace', or how this differs from list_release_plans. Given no annotations and low parameter guidance, the description is somewhat incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%; the description does not explain the namespace, cluster, or application_name parameters. The phrase 'target workspace' might hint at namespace but does not clarify required vs optional semantics. The description fails to compensate for the lack of schema documentation.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb ('List'), resource ('Konflux Releases'), and the key fields returned (snapshot, status, target workspace). This distinguishes it from related sibling tools like list_snapshots or list_release_plans, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of exclusions, prerequisites, or relationship to list_release_plans/list_snapshots. The only implicit signal is the 'List' verb, which does not aid selection among many sibling tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.