get_alert_details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or require any special permissions, leaving the agent to infer safety from context. Adding a note about destructiveness would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose without any extraneous words. Every word contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the output schema exists (so return values need not be explained), the description could be more complete by mentioning the optional cluster parameter and clarifying the difference from similar list tools. However, for a simple detail retrieval, it provides the essential information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. The description mentions 'named alert' which relates to the required 'alert_name' parameter, but does not explain the optional 'cluster' parameter or provide any constraints or formatting details. The parameter names are self-explanatory, but the description adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'full labels, annotations, status, and silence info for all instances of a named alert.' It distinguishes from siblings like list_alerts and list_alerting_rules by specifying it retrieves detailed info for a specific alert by name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (getting details for a named alert) but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_alerts or list_alerting_rules, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.