figma_refresh_variables
Reload variables from the Figma file to synchronize design tokens with the source of truth.
Instructions
Refresh variables from the file.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Reload variables from the Figma file to synchronize design tokens with the source of truth.
Refresh variables from the file.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations indicate the tool is neither read-only nor destructive, but the description fails to explain the behavioral implications of 'refresh.' It does not disclose side effects, permissions, or what changes occur, leaving the agent uninformed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is maximally concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite no parameters or output schema, the description is too vague given the context of many variable-related sibling tools. It does not specify how 'refresh' differs from other operations, making it incomplete for proper selection.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, so the description does not need to elaborate on them. The baseline for zero parameters is 4, and the description adequately conveys the action and resource.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Refresh variables from the file,' which combines a verb and resource but lacks specificity on what 'refresh' entails. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like figma_get_variables or figma_update_variable, leaving ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. No context or prerequisites are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atezer/FMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server