figma_delete_variable_collection
Delete a variable collection from Figma using its collection ID. Removes the entire collection and variables.
Instructions
Delete a variable collection.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectionId | Yes |
Delete a variable collection from Figma using its collection ID. Removes the entire collection and variables.
Delete a variable collection.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectionId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations provide destructiveHint=true, so the agent knows it's destructive. However, the description adds no additional behavioral details (e.g., irreversibility, side effects on contained variables, error conditions). It merely restates the action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence with no unnecessary words, but it borders on underspecification. Concise yet lacking essential context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple deletion tool, the description is incomplete: no mention of behavior, side effects, or expected input format. Even with annotations, the agent lacks guidance on safe usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% (no description on collectionId). The description provides zero parameter information—no format, example, or constraints—leaving the agent to guess the required input.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it deletes a variable collection, distinguishing from sibling tools like figma_delete_variable (deletes a variable) and figma_create_variable_collection (creates). The verb-resource pair is specific and unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives, or any prerequisites (e.g., collection must exist, cannot delete if in use). The agent receives no context for correct invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atezer/FMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server