figma_clear_console
Remove all messages from the plugin console log to start fresh for debugging.
Instructions
Clear the plugin console log buffer.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Remove all messages from the plugin console log to start fresh for debugging.
Clear the plugin console log buffer.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not add behavioral context beyond the destructiveHint annotation. It does not explain irreversibility or side effects, but it does not contradict the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, short sentence that is immediately understandable. It is front-loaded and uses no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a parameterless tool with no output schema, the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose. It could mention return value or confirmation, but it is not strictly necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, and the schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter information, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'clear' and the resource 'console log buffer'. It is distinct from sibling tools like figma_get_console_logs and figma_watch_console.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No information is provided about when to use this tool or when to avoid it. No alternatives or conditions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/atezer/FMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server