find_solution
Search past solutions by entering an error message or keyword to find previously resolved issues.
Instructions
過去の解決策を検索
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | 検索キーワード(エラーメッセージの一部など) |
Search past solutions by entering an error message or keyword to find previously resolved issues.
過去の解決策を検索
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | 検索キーワード(エラーメッセージの一部など) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only says 'search' without describing what the tool returns, side effects, or limitations. Does not inform about read-only nature or any context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but lacks sufficient information to be effective. It is not excessively verbose but also not adequately informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and a single parameter, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return format, result limits, or any constraints, leaving the agent without essential behavioral context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% as the single parameter 'query' is described. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Search past solutions' specifies a verb (search) and resource (solutions), but is vague. It doesn't clarify what constitutes a 'solution' or distinguish it from sibling tools like search_sessions or search_sheets.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The schema hint about searching error messages is not in the description. No exclusions or alternative tools mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asicojp/sparksheets-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server